Reviewer Guidelines

Ethical Considerations

This section outlines the ethical principles that reviewers must adhere to, including confidentiality, objectivity, and disclosure of conflicts of interest.

Confidentiality

Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality:

  • Do not share the manuscript or its contents with anyone without editor permission
  • Do not use information from the manuscript for your own research
  • Do not contact the authors directly
  • Destroy or delete the manuscript after completing your review

Objectivity and Bias

Reviews should be objective and unbiased:

  • Evaluate manuscripts based on scientific merit, not personal preferences
  • Avoid making assumptions about authors based on gender, nationality, or institution
  • Do not allow competitive or personal relationships to influence your evaluation
  • Focus on the work itself, not the authors' reputation

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest:

  • Personal relationships with authors
  • Professional collaborations within the past 3 years
  • Financial interests related to the research
  • Academic competition with the authors
  • Institutional affiliations with the authors

If you have a conflict, decline the review invitation and notify the editor.

Identifying Ethical Issues

Reviewers should be alert to potential ethical problems:

  • Plagiarism or duplicate publication
  • Data fabrication or falsification
  • Image manipulation
  • Inappropriate authorship
  • Unethical research practices

Report any concerns directly to the editor in your confidential comments.