Reviewer Guidelines
Ethical Considerations
This section outlines the ethical principles that reviewers must adhere to, including confidentiality, objectivity, and disclosure of conflicts of interest.
Confidentiality
Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality:
- Do not share the manuscript or its contents with anyone without editor permission
- Do not use information from the manuscript for your own research
- Do not contact the authors directly
- Destroy or delete the manuscript after completing your review
Objectivity and Bias
Reviews should be objective and unbiased:
- Evaluate manuscripts based on scientific merit, not personal preferences
- Avoid making assumptions about authors based on gender, nationality, or institution
- Do not allow competitive or personal relationships to influence your evaluation
- Focus on the work itself, not the authors' reputation
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest:
- Personal relationships with authors
- Professional collaborations within the past 3 years
- Financial interests related to the research
- Academic competition with the authors
- Institutional affiliations with the authors
If you have a conflict, decline the review invitation and notify the editor.
Identifying Ethical Issues
Reviewers should be alert to potential ethical problems:
- Plagiarism or duplicate publication
- Data fabrication or falsification
- Image manipulation
- Inappropriate authorship
- Unethical research practices
Report any concerns directly to the editor in your confidential comments.